Worst Medieval Monarchs

 

The Worst Medieval Monarchs- Phil Bradford

Pen & Sword

Release Date: September 30, 2023

Rating: 📚📚📚📚📚

Synopsis: Stephen. John. Edward II. Richard II. Richard III. These five are widely viewed as the worst of England’s medieval kings. Certainly, their reigns were not success stories. Two of these kings lost their thrones, one only avoided doing so by dying, another was killed in battle, and the remaining one had to leave his crown to his opponent. All have been seen as incompetent, their reigns blighted by civil war and conflict. They tore the realm apart, failing in the basic duty of a king to ensure peace and justice. For that, all of them paid a heavy price. As well as incompetence, some also have reputations for cruelty and villainy, More than one has been portrayed as a tyrant. The murder of family members and arbitrary executions stain their reputations. All five reigns ended in failure. As a result, the kings have been seen as failures themselves, the worst examples of medieval English kingship. They lost their reputations as well as their crowns.

Yet were these five really the worst men to wear the crown of England in the Middle Ages? Or has history treated them unfairly? This book looks at the stories of their lives and reigns, all of which were dramatic and often unpredictable. It then examines how they have been seen since their deaths, the ways their reputations have been shaped across the centuries. The standards of their own age were different to our own. How these kings have been judged has changed over time, sometimes dramatically. Fiction, from Shakespeare’s plays to modern films, has also played its part in creating the modern picture. Many things have created, over a long period, the negative reputations of these five. Today, they have come to number among the worst kings of English history. Is this fair, or should they be redeemed?

That is the question this book sets out to answer.

______________________________________________________________

This was a really excellent look at 5 medieval English monarchs: Stephen, John, Edward II, Richard II, and Richard III. The author states up front that labeling people (maybe especially monarchs) 'best' or 'worst' anything is fraught with all sorts of problems but since that's the kind of age we live in now, he's looking at five medieval kings who are generally argued to be pretty bad. He explains that they will be looked at in the context of their time and then tells us what kingship meant in that time and how their people would have been judging them. Seems like a concept that should be obvious, but so many don't do this to put us all on a level playing field that I was both amazed and delighted to find this book doing so!

Bradford kept on delighting me by taking each monarch and giving a brief summary of their lives, then following how chroniclers treated their legacy, how they were viewed through the centuries, and how that view could shift (occasionally dramatically) through time depending on what different historians were trying to prove. Which usually had more to do with the historian and their viewpoint or propaganda than the monarch and his original life. How has popular culture treated each king? And then Bradford's final verdict on whether the king deserves to be known as among the "worst" medieval monarchs or not. 

I loved the sections where Bradford follows the king's legacy through the centuries and how historians have argued over them and used them to show different angles. Likewise, the sections on popular culture really help you understand how, while some kings aren't hurt by it, others are forever branded in popular opinion in certain ways. No matter what historians may decide, poor King John is never going to be seen in popular culture as anything other than the easy villain of Robin Hood stories. Almost more a stereotype than an actual person. And let's not even talk about Shakespeare and Richard III!

Well-researched, well-written, with arguments clearly expressed for you to agree or disagree with (or inspire you to read more about), Bradford does an excellent job of presenting pretty balanced accounts for each king. His emphasis on placing each man in their historical context to be judged in medieval context alone was excellent, and something I wish was done more often when it comes to history.

I definitely recommend this book to history lovers, those looking to start exploring medieval times and their monarchs, and people just looking for a good book!

I received this book from NetGalley in exchange for an honest review